Here is nike fuel band review from engadget.com:
Nike FuelBand SE review: more social features, much longer battery life. Nike's new FuelBand is now out, and following a few weeks of running in parks, walking around exhibition halls and the occasional all-out exercise session, well, I'm pretty tired. Fortunately, I only needed to charge Nike's new wearable once in my first eight days of use. Indeed, that's the main benefit to Nike's Second Edition (SE) FuelBand: thanks to an energy-efficient Bluetooth Low Energy (LE) radio, it promises much-improved battery life over its predecessor. When it comes to the physical hardware, however, its appearance has barely changed since 2012, save for three new color options (and a highfalutin' Rose Gold one). Its fitness-tracking capabilities haven't changed either, although Nike has promised improvements in accuracy and a better ability to sense when you're attempting to game the FuelBand.
Beneath the matte black surface, however, there's been more progress: Nike+, the FuelBand's companion app, is friendlier than ever, with the ability to group your buddies into separate categories. There are also new hourly reminders to stay active throughout the day and a Sessions feature to monitor activity in a set timeframe. More than ever, though, Nike's finding itself in a crowded wearables market. Though it was one of the early victors, has it done enough to maintain its lead? Grab your water bottle and we'll walk you through it.
Pros
Decent battery life
Sleek design
Connects to your Facebook friends list
Cons
Still no Android app
Not geared toward fitness buffs
Pointless sleep monitoring feature
Summary
The FuelBand SE doesn't offer any earth-shattering changes from its predecessor, but its design, longer battery life and enhanced social features ensure it continues to be a solid choice among fitness trackers.
Nike fuel band review gizmodoHere is nike fuel band review from gizmodo.com:
Like
The main thing the FuelBand has going for it is the cool factor. It's Nike! It's stylish! Look, athletes wear it, or at least according to promotional events and adverts, they do. All-stars like Shawn Johnson, Victor Cruz, Ashton Eaton? They were all at the launch event to woo human blob bloggers writing about the device. I liked that the FuelBand looks good with whatever I'm wearing, whether it's to go to the gym or to go to dinner. It's like a little piece of jewelry that reminds you not to be such a lardass.
The main thing the FuelBand has going for it is the cool factor. It's Nike! It's stylish! Look, athletes wear it, or at least according to promotional events and adverts, they do. All-stars like Shawn Johnson, Victor Cruz, Ashton Eaton? They were all at the launch event to woo human blob bloggers writing about the device. I liked that the FuelBand looks good with whatever I'm wearing, whether it's to go to the gym or to go to dinner. It's like a little piece of jewelry that reminds you not to be such a lardass.
No Like
Nike says it improved the algorithm for how it tracks your movement. How it did so, exactly, is unclear. Yes, the accelerometer picks up on info like how many steps you've walked and at what speed and such, but it doesn't really seem like it's tracking that much. Or at least, that it's not tracking the very important how.
People would regularly notice this rubbery bracelet designed to help me get swole as hell, and they'd ask what it was. When I'd explain how it worked, I'd use a few demonstrative fist bumps to boost my fuel points from, say, 2180 to 2186. So while, sure, you definitely earn more points the more you move and the faster you move, ultimately, the FuelBand feels a little pointless and easy to manipulate. I also somehow ended up nabbing the most points while engaging in risk behaviors. You'd be surprised how many points you get while lifting beers that long distance from the table to your mouth hole over and over and over. Yes, it's possible to binge drink your way to success—Nike's version of it, anyway.
The FuelBand also notably, still lacks both an altimeter and heart rate monitor, both of which would enrich the data immensely. Now, the heart rate monitor is less of an oversight at this point, because not many other fitness trackers have 'em. The Basis Band does, but we also found that it was also kind of ugly and buggy. The lack of an altimeter is a bigger issue, because the amount of calories you burn walking up a hill versus walking on a flat street is very different.
Nike says it improved the algorithm for how it tracks your movement. How it did so, exactly, is unclear. Yes, the accelerometer picks up on info like how many steps you've walked and at what speed and such, but it doesn't really seem like it's tracking that much. Or at least, that it's not tracking the very important how.
People would regularly notice this rubbery bracelet designed to help me get swole as hell, and they'd ask what it was. When I'd explain how it worked, I'd use a few demonstrative fist bumps to boost my fuel points from, say, 2180 to 2186. So while, sure, you definitely earn more points the more you move and the faster you move, ultimately, the FuelBand feels a little pointless and easy to manipulate. I also somehow ended up nabbing the most points while engaging in risk behaviors. You'd be surprised how many points you get while lifting beers that long distance from the table to your mouth hole over and over and over. Yes, it's possible to binge drink your way to success—Nike's version of it, anyway.
The FuelBand also notably, still lacks both an altimeter and heart rate monitor, both of which would enrich the data immensely. Now, the heart rate monitor is less of an oversight at this point, because not many other fitness trackers have 'em. The Basis Band does, but we also found that it was also kind of ugly and buggy. The lack of an altimeter is a bigger issue, because the amount of calories you burn walking up a hill versus walking on a flat street is very different.
Nike fuel band review cnetHere is Nike Fuelband review from cnet.com:
The Good The Nike+ FuelBand SE adds Bluetooth 4.0 for continuous syncing, more water resistance for wearing in the shower, hourly motivational reminders, and solid social connectivity with other Nike+ users.
The Bad No Android support; only works with iPhone 4S and later; Bluetooth syncing can get quirky; no vibration for silent alarms or hourly reminders; app's toolset is a little simplistic; doesn't track sleep.
The Bottom Line The Nike+ FuelBand SE is a minor upgrade to last year's FuelBand, adding Bluetooth 4.0 and a few new motivational wrinkles to its software, but the band's design is more successful than its package of features.
Nike fuel band review youtube
Here is Nike fuel band review on Youtube:
Nike fuel band review wired
Here is nike fuel band review from wired.com:
Nike is marketing the FuelBand to athletes, but the shoe company already has several more powerful workout monitors in its lineup. The Nike+ SportWatch GPS, which Wired reviewed last July, lets you join the Nike+ community, but adds a GPS and a foot pod to help track distance and map routes, and will even link with Polar heart-rate monitors. Meanwhile, Nike’s SportBand pairs with that same foot pod and records pace, distance, time, and calories. With those tools coming in at $199 and $59 respectively, the $149 retail price of the FuelBand starts to look a little steep for a basic accelerometer-based wrist band, albeit a fancy one.
So don’t expect the FuelBand to replace your workout GPS. That said, while the band doesn’t include a lot of features, it’s still a boldly stylish wrist accessory. Its color LED display is a conversation starter, and in shape and size it resembles a Livestrong bracelet more than a dive watch. Bling factor aside, any serious FuelBand owner will be more interested in daily activity totals, and it’s satisfying to see calories burned, steps and Fuel points pile up. When you reach your daily goals, you’ll acquire “achievements,” but don’t expect any detailed information about your workout.
So don’t expect the FuelBand to replace your workout GPS. That said, while the band doesn’t include a lot of features, it’s still a boldly stylish wrist accessory. Its color LED display is a conversation starter, and in shape and size it resembles a Livestrong bracelet more than a dive watch. Bling factor aside, any serious FuelBand owner will be more interested in daily activity totals, and it’s satisfying to see calories burned, steps and Fuel points pile up. When you reach your daily goals, you’ll acquire “achievements,” but don’t expect any detailed information about your workout.
Nike fuel band review verge
Here is nike fuel band review from the verge:
The Nike FuelBand SE wristband tracks time, calories, and steps, as well as NikeFuel, the company's activity-based point system. The SE model adds colorful variations on the design as well as built-in Bluetooth 4. There was a time in my life when I recorded every piece of food I ate and every step I took. I kept a meal and exercise journal — an actual journal — before I had one on my computer. Once online tools like LoseIt! and MyFitnessPal became popular, I tried a slew of those. I’ve had too many pedometers to count. All of those things helped me monitor my food intake and exercise, showing me all the calories I consumed, all the miles I walked, and other metrics I never fully understood but knew were important. But I never stuck with any of them.
Gabriel Koepp, the program manager of research operations at Arizona State University’s Obesity Solutions center, tells me I’m not alone: 90 percent of people who try some kind of fitness trackers stick with it for three weeks to two months, he says, and then stop using it. "It's cool to see at first," Koepp says, "but then the information the device gives a user isn't valuable anymore and people lose interest." That still leaves 10 percent, who he says will use one tracker to make lasting change in their lives. The brand of tracker is nearly irrelevant — for some people, all they need is a constant reminder of their progress, and that’s enough to keep them on track for years. This can work.
Gabriel Koepp, the program manager of research operations at Arizona State University’s Obesity Solutions center, tells me I’m not alone: 90 percent of people who try some kind of fitness trackers stick with it for three weeks to two months, he says, and then stop using it. "It's cool to see at first," Koepp says, "but then the information the device gives a user isn't valuable anymore and people lose interest." That still leaves 10 percent, who he says will use one tracker to make lasting change in their lives. The brand of tracker is nearly irrelevant — for some people, all they need is a constant reminder of their progress, and that’s enough to keep them on track for years. This can work.
Nike fuel band review cycling
The Nike+ FuelBand is not recommended for cycling because the device is
not optimized to accurately track this type of workout. The FuelBand may
capture some data if worn while bicycling, but the amount of NikeFuel
recorded will not correlate with distance, effort, or other
cycling-related metrics.
No comments:
Post a Comment